Comparison and TPACK Reflection
The article “Preservice Teachers’ Reflection on Clinical
Experiences: A Comparison of Blog and Final Paper Assignments” discusses the
advantages and differences of blogging and paper assignments. In the article,
it states that reflections can best use to analyzing connections and
relationships from students and teachers, but students and students. Reflection
is important because while in the process of reflecting, there is more
concentration and consideration of the paper. As a teacher, reflection can help
you take what you know about teaching and new things to learn to help your
students with a better ability and understanding. The article states that,
“teachers who have adopted reflective practices will be better equipped to meet
their students’ individual needs.” More focus is being brought to “identifying
the presence of reflective content rather than other types of assignments.” It
is said that blogging is much easier for students and teachers than having
paper assignments in the classroom. Blogging shares their writing with not only
the teacher but the students as well. This helps with immediate feedback and
helpful tips from fellow students and the teacher. Also, submitting through a
blog, the assignment remains visible to the student instead of waiting to see
it after the teacher has graded it. There are four ways to assessing reflection
starting with habitual action. This means that “reproducing material without
showing evidence of understanding it”. The second scheme is understanding,
followed by understanding, reflection, and critical reflection. In the end, we
can say that reflection post to blogs over paper reflections is far more
effective in a classroom. The other article refers to the Technological
Pedagogical Content Knowledge, the framework for teacher knowledge. The
framework of teaching is built off of three things known as technology, context
knowledge, and Pedagogical knowledge. These three domains support each other
for effective and good teaching.